9/10.But it's almost like an art movie, the first science-fiction art film
It's a futuristic film beautifully put together
It's really impeccably made by one of the great visionary directors
And you really saw a future that looked very different from the future you had seen before
A future that looked very believable like the visual-effects shots of the flying car going over a futuristic city
The fight sequence doesn't prepare you for the traumatic emotional side that there is in the film, it leaves you sort of broken.This is a film that is so deep, rich, and multi-layered, it may require more than one viewing to fully absorb the brilliance of what you've just seen. Dark, deep, uncertain, unsettling imagine the most beautiful nightmare you've ever had this is Blade Runner (1982). Blade Runner shocked audiences of the time with it’s grundy punk setting that would not only set the tone for the rest of the movie, but for Sci-fi for years to come. However, I don’t place all the blame with Ford because he acts the same way throughout the whole film leading me to believe that he was directed to do so in Scott’s attempt to keep the noir feel of the film.Although I believe that the dialogue failed to effectively tell the story I believe that Blade Runners strengths lies with its visual storytelling.
| Rating: 10/10 The sets are all extremely dark and only lit by contrasting red and blue lighting.
This is the biggest flaw of the film in my opinion as key information is hard to take in because of not only the way the scene is shot but the performances of the actors. Even the most fantastic imagery comes from some of the most basic things, such as smoke from a cigarette glimmering in sunlight. |,August 2, 2015 Call it restorative work if you will. Please enter your email address and we will email you a new password.We want to hear what you have to say but need to verify your account. Steam billows from all compass points. On a first viewing I don’t think I picked up on all the themes and details in the film due to being bored at times of the film and tuning out. For a film so raved about by nearly every critic, the plot is cookie cutter and drab. I'm giving this a 5 just for visuals and the fact that this probably has inspired quite a bit of (better) sci-fi today.Sometimes you just need to give a film a second chance, even if it is 20 years later! I thought you were supposed to be good. In his view, the City of Angels has become a ghoulish circus of towering, pyramid-like buildings, flying cars, space stations and a constant barrage of TV commercial hype writhing on the sides of monstrous buildings and from blimps endlessly careening through an air that's dense with searchlights, smoke, smog and dust. I would suggest picking up a reader by someone like Nietzsche, Foucualt, Descartes, Kierkegaard, or any of the great existentialist philosophers after viewing this film in order to appreciate the story & its concepts at a whole new level, regardless if you're watching it for either the 1st, or the 100th time. The lighting in the film tells the audience so much about the characters without the need for dialogue.
It's all downhill after the first few eye-dazzling minutes. So, what makes these old films, Blade Runner in particular, so good looking compared to modern films, despite the fact that they had little technology back then? Along with 2001: A Space Odyssey, it is one of the most philosophical and influential movies ever created, as it conveys a plethora of fundamental questions, which are woven in the very fabric of the human essence and existence. |,August 27, 2019 Its essence and idiosyncracy resides in its fundamental yet underlying theme that is existence in itself. [Full Review in Spanish],The percentage of Approved Tomatometer Critics who have given this movie a positive review.The percentage of users who rated this 3.5 stars or higher.Sidney Poitier’s 7 Most Memorable Performances,All Harry Potter Movies Ranked Worst to Best by Tomatometer.Binge Guide: The 5 Most Bingeable Shows Ever!We want to hear what you have to say but need to verify your email. [11 Sept 1992].It looks fabulous, it uses special effects to create a new world of its own, but it is thin in its human story.As before, the movie is more impressive for its finely detailed vision of Los Angeles as a futuristic slum than for its story, acting, or message.
Director Ridley Scott seems to want to savor every shot, and an astute audience will be able to sense this.This is simply Scott's finest hour. One of the most important themes in the film is the question of what is more valuable - humans without emotions, or machines with? You can use a text widget to display text, links, images, HTML, or a combination of these. ... Lire la critique de Blade Runner. Made by Tyrell Corporation under the motto "more humans than humans" -especially the "Nexus-6" models- not only resembles humans, they are far superior physically.Dark, deep, uncertain, unsettling imagine the most beautiful nightmare you've ever had this is Blade Runner (1982).Blade Runner belongs on a list of 2 or 3 movies that had me walking out of the theater in a stupor as though hit by a sledgehammer, the first time I saw it. Année : 1982. This 10-digit number is your confirmation number.Your AMC Ticket Confirmation# can be found in your order confirmation email.Still profound 18 years after its sell-by date, Blade Runner remains worthy of acclaim and analysis even as it exists in a "future" with very little resemblance to the one that came to pass.Ridley Scott has produced a new vision that is forbidding.Film noir cubed, science fiction a step beyond 2001.A masterpiece of dystopian science fiction on film.Too bad the filmmakers didn't try to recapture the modest virtues of the Dick novel, which (despite many flaws of its own) has a humor and humanity that are nowhere felt in 'Blade Runner.The contradictions that plague the movie are apparent from the outset.Everything, from the punkish clothing to the compact gadgetry, comments wittily on the present while also establishing a coherent future.The set designs and overall look of the film are nothing short of inspired.This is one of the great visions ever put on screen, a massive and formative illustration of world building.The score by Vangelis amplifies the emotion of every scene seamlessly, and enough can't be said about the production design by Lawrence G. Paull and visual effects by Douglas Trumbull.Visual flair, philosophical substance, and kick-ass action can come together to make an entertaining and artistically compelling movie.
Don’t worry, it won’t take long.
| Rating: 10/10 The sets are all extremely dark and only lit by contrasting red and blue lighting.
This is the biggest flaw of the film in my opinion as key information is hard to take in because of not only the way the scene is shot but the performances of the actors. Even the most fantastic imagery comes from some of the most basic things, such as smoke from a cigarette glimmering in sunlight. |,August 2, 2015 Call it restorative work if you will. Please enter your email address and we will email you a new password.We want to hear what you have to say but need to verify your account. Steam billows from all compass points. On a first viewing I don’t think I picked up on all the themes and details in the film due to being bored at times of the film and tuning out. For a film so raved about by nearly every critic, the plot is cookie cutter and drab. I'm giving this a 5 just for visuals and the fact that this probably has inspired quite a bit of (better) sci-fi today.Sometimes you just need to give a film a second chance, even if it is 20 years later! I thought you were supposed to be good. In his view, the City of Angels has become a ghoulish circus of towering, pyramid-like buildings, flying cars, space stations and a constant barrage of TV commercial hype writhing on the sides of monstrous buildings and from blimps endlessly careening through an air that's dense with searchlights, smoke, smog and dust. I would suggest picking up a reader by someone like Nietzsche, Foucualt, Descartes, Kierkegaard, or any of the great existentialist philosophers after viewing this film in order to appreciate the story & its concepts at a whole new level, regardless if you're watching it for either the 1st, or the 100th time. The lighting in the film tells the audience so much about the characters without the need for dialogue.
It's all downhill after the first few eye-dazzling minutes. So, what makes these old films, Blade Runner in particular, so good looking compared to modern films, despite the fact that they had little technology back then? Along with 2001: A Space Odyssey, it is one of the most philosophical and influential movies ever created, as it conveys a plethora of fundamental questions, which are woven in the very fabric of the human essence and existence. |,August 27, 2019 Its essence and idiosyncracy resides in its fundamental yet underlying theme that is existence in itself. [Full Review in Spanish],The percentage of Approved Tomatometer Critics who have given this movie a positive review.The percentage of users who rated this 3.5 stars or higher.Sidney Poitier’s 7 Most Memorable Performances,All Harry Potter Movies Ranked Worst to Best by Tomatometer.Binge Guide: The 5 Most Bingeable Shows Ever!We want to hear what you have to say but need to verify your email. [11 Sept 1992].It looks fabulous, it uses special effects to create a new world of its own, but it is thin in its human story.As before, the movie is more impressive for its finely detailed vision of Los Angeles as a futuristic slum than for its story, acting, or message.
Director Ridley Scott seems to want to savor every shot, and an astute audience will be able to sense this.This is simply Scott's finest hour. One of the most important themes in the film is the question of what is more valuable - humans without emotions, or machines with? You can use a text widget to display text, links, images, HTML, or a combination of these. ... Lire la critique de Blade Runner. Made by Tyrell Corporation under the motto "more humans than humans" -especially the "Nexus-6" models- not only resembles humans, they are far superior physically.Dark, deep, uncertain, unsettling imagine the most beautiful nightmare you've ever had this is Blade Runner (1982).Blade Runner belongs on a list of 2 or 3 movies that had me walking out of the theater in a stupor as though hit by a sledgehammer, the first time I saw it. Année : 1982. This 10-digit number is your confirmation number.Your AMC Ticket Confirmation# can be found in your order confirmation email.Still profound 18 years after its sell-by date, Blade Runner remains worthy of acclaim and analysis even as it exists in a "future" with very little resemblance to the one that came to pass.Ridley Scott has produced a new vision that is forbidding.Film noir cubed, science fiction a step beyond 2001.A masterpiece of dystopian science fiction on film.Too bad the filmmakers didn't try to recapture the modest virtues of the Dick novel, which (despite many flaws of its own) has a humor and humanity that are nowhere felt in 'Blade Runner.The contradictions that plague the movie are apparent from the outset.Everything, from the punkish clothing to the compact gadgetry, comments wittily on the present while also establishing a coherent future.The set designs and overall look of the film are nothing short of inspired.This is one of the great visions ever put on screen, a massive and formative illustration of world building.The score by Vangelis amplifies the emotion of every scene seamlessly, and enough can't be said about the production design by Lawrence G. Paull and visual effects by Douglas Trumbull.Visual flair, philosophical substance, and kick-ass action can come together to make an entertaining and artistically compelling movie.
Don’t worry, it won’t take long.